Alevtina Ibragimova vs Zoziya Kardava Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Second Serve Performance: Alevtina Ibragimova has outperformed Zoziya Kardava in winning points on their second serve, with 38.93% compared to 30.25%. Is this a key advantage? Likely, given its correlation to match outcomes.
• Return Game Stats: Zoziya Kardava excels in return performance, securing 59.19% of points on opponent's second serves, surpassing Alevtina’s 52.48%. On first serve returns, Kardava also leads, winning 39.82% to Ibragimova's 33.96%.
• Under Pressure Analysis: Breakpoint saving abilities show Ibragimova with a slight edge, saving 51.18% versus Kardava's 43.67%, potentially crucial during tight matches.
• Performance Overview: Despite Ibragimova's slightly lower match win percentage (50.85% against Kardava's 59.26%), consider the context of their competition levels. Ibragimova competed more in higher-level tournaments.
• Best Surface: Both players have their best win percentages on different surfaces—Kardava on Hard (61%) and Ibragimova on Clay (61%). Could surface play a crucial role here?
• Player Level: Kardava has found success in lower-tiered competitions ($10K), while Ibragimova played at a marginally higher level (Challengers/ITF > $10K). Does experience at different levels indicate potential advantage?
• Opponent Quality: Kardava has encountered slightly better-ranked competitors (average rank 333.65) compared to Ibragimova (343.86), which might hint at tougher match experience.
• Deciding Set Performance: Ibragimova boasts a 50% success rate in deciding sets, slightly better than Kardava’s 41%, which could be vital if the match is closely contested.
• Break Point Conversion: Marginally better breakpoint conversion is observed in Ibragimova at 48.68% compared to Kardava's 44.86%, an important aspect in breaking serve during the match.

Editorial Prediction (November 23, 2025, UTC):

Alevtina Ibragimova and Zoziya Kardava are set for a closely contested match, with both players showing distinct strengths. Ibragimova's proficiency on second serves might give her an edge, especially considering the influential nature of this statistic in match outcomes.

Kardava's impressive return game performance could offset this advantage, particularly if she capitalizes on Ibragimova's serves. However, Ibragimova's slight upper hand in handling pressure situations and breakpoint conversions may prove decisive.

While Kardava has a higher win percentage, the differential in tournament levels they have competed in adds complexity to direct comparisons. Surface type could also play a role if the match venue favors one player's historical strengths.

Ultimately, based on the intricate blend of stats, Alevtina Ibragimova seems to have the slight edge and is most likely to emerge victorious, barring any unforeseen fluctuations in performance dynamics.